Browse Category DEFAULT

8 thoughts on “ No Government As A Way Of Life

  1. Jun 26,  · A Day in the Life. Assume it’s an ordinary weekday. You have to get your toddler up, dressed, fed, and to day care so you can get to work (for a private company, of course, since there are no.
  2. Jun 25,  · The Following WeeksOnce the chaos of the initial disappearance of the government abated, there would be a sorting out of day-to-day life. Governments have fallen in many countries around the world.
  3. People are able to survive in the wilderness without help. The people back in the Stone Age managed it. Life without government is possible, but it might not be easy or efficient. Life, or survival, in itself only means that you won't die. That of course is possible, as proved by history and explorers. However, society, perhaps not so much.
  4. Sep 24,  · SACHA PFEIFFER, HOST: The writer Tsitsi Dangarembga has traced the history of Zimbabwe in a trilogy of novels from the end of colonialism and white minority rule through the country’s war for independence too, in her most recent book “This Mournable Body,” the tyrannical period following the joys of independence, a period marked by crackdown on dissent.
  5. Anarchy is the state of a society being freely constituted without authorities or a governing may also refer to a society or group of people that entirely rejects a set hierarchy. Anarchy was first used in , meaning "an absence of government". Pierre-Joseph Proudhon adopted anarchy and anarchist in his treatise What Is Property? to refer to anarchism, a new political.
  6. “There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.” ― Ayn Rand.
  7. Official video for Nicolette's seminal "No Government". Website:
  8. This trepidation is fair. Family life is very intimate after all; the government should not have its hands in such personal affairs or should it? By no means am I contending that there should be mandates on familial choices, like the horrific “one child policy” in China. Such decisions are critical aspects of basic civil and religious.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *